Threat to undermine decades of work to restore and protect threatened species.

30 June 2021 | Posted in Conservation
Threat to undermine decades of work to restore and protect threatened species.
Water Vole by Roger Wilmshurst

Sussex Wildlife Trust has joined 30 conservation NGOs to issue an open letter to oppose a review of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, which could undermine decades of work to restore and protect threatened species.

Protection could be lost for species including adder and pine marten. Protection under threat for 300+ other species including water vole.

You can read the letter below.

28 June 2021
Dear JNCC, Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and NatureScot,
Re: 7th Quinquennial Review (QQR) of Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981)

We are writing this open letter to you in response to the decision by the QQR Review Group (consisting of JNCC and the three country nature conservation bodies and representatives of the non-governmental sector) to change the eligibility criteria for which species will be included on Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act. This change means that an animal or plant species will only be protected when it is in imminent danger of extinction as defined by the highest categories in the IUCN red listing process, or those identified as European Protected Species. This decision has been made without due consultation and to date has not considered concerns raised by NGOs. In fact the NGO’s that have raised concern about the changes have been told that the decision has been made and can’t be questioned. It also fails to consider the consequences of such changes to the eligibility criteria which would mean that large numbers of species will now no longer be protected against killing and sale by law.

We have numerous serious concerns regarding this decision and the decision making process. These include but are not limited to:

  • • Removal of protection will mean that these species will legally be allowed to be killed. This will enable building developments to take place with no consideration of the impacts on formerly protected species such as slow worms and water voles if a case cannot be made to keep them listed. It also means that it will once again be legal to persecute adders, pine martens and mountain hares – despite all of the costly efforts to try and conserve these vulnerable species.
  • • Removal of protection will mean it would become legal to trade wild-caught British species including amphibians and butterflies – which as well as directly causing population declines would also pose a huge biosecurity risk, since this could result in wild animals being moved around, and entering into captive collections alongside animals imported from elsewhere in the world. This is of particular concern for widespread amphibians that are at serious risk from Chytrid and Severe Perkinsea Infection which have wiped out populations of amphibians worldwide and have both been found in captive collections in the UK.
  • • Whilst very valuable, the GB IUCN red listing process is not suitable for this purpose. It is complex and requires high levels of evidence of population trends. This in turn requires high level species surveys and analysis of the data to determine population trends at a national scale. There has been no provision made as to how this will be resourced and an assumption that NGO’s will take on the burden of this work. IUCN guidance specifically identifies automatic use of Red List categories in policy as an "inappropriate use" of the Red List; and the IUCN Red List category "Vulnerable" is a "Threatened" category, which means it is "facing a high risk of extinction in the wild".
  • • The changes that have been decided by the QQR Review Group remove the opportunity to prevent species decline. Under the changes outlined we will only be reacting to catastrophic species declines.

We would like to formally request that the QQR Review Group carry out a public consultation on the decision to change the eligibility criteria before proceeding with the planned timetable.

We await your response.

Yours Sincerely,

The Froglife Trust
People's Trust for Endangered Species (PTES)
Amphibian and Reptile Groups of UK (ARG UK)
Glasgow Natural History Society
Trees for Life
Biological Recording in Scotland (BRISC)
British Hedgehog Preservation Society
Vincent Wildlife Trust (VWT)
Bat Conservation Trust
Sussex Wildlife Trust
Pesticide Action Network UK (PAN UK)
Marine Conservation Society
The Wildlife Trusts
Freshwater Habitats Trust
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty
to Animals (RSPCA)
Friends of Glasgow’s Local Nature
Amphibian and Reptile Conservation
Citizen Zoo
Scottish Badgers
Wildlife and Countryside Link
Scottish Environment LINK
Bumblebee Conservation Trust
Scottish Wild Land Group
Rewilding Britain
Badger Trust
Wales Environment Link
The Zoological Society of London (ZSL)

*Additional signatories added after the letter was first sent:
Butterfly Conservation
British and Irish Association of Zoos and
Aquariums (BIAZA)
Scottish Wildlife Trust
CPRE Kent, the countryside charity

Leave a comment